• Categories

  • Pages

  • Archives

The 5 Stupidest Lawsuits of 2010

IRS building on Constitution Avenue in Washing...

Image via Wikipedia

5. Feds v. Feds.  Winner: Irrelevant; Loser: Taxpayers.

Feds vs. Feds in ‘Stupidest Lawsuit Ever’

That’s the characterization, with only “slight hyperbole,” that Bloomberg columnist Jonathan Weil slaps on a suit filed by Freddie Mac, the congressionally chartered housing finance organization, against the IRS, which says Freddie owes $3 billion in back taxes.  From: FedBlog

4. The mother of all lawsuits.

McDonald’s suit over Happy Meal toys by California mom Monet Parham new low in responsible parenting

No one forced Parham to take her daughters to McDonald’s, buy them that particular menu item, and sit by as they ate every last French fry in the bag (if they did).

No, she’s suing because when she said no, her kids became disagreeable and “pouted” – for which she wants class action status.  More

3. Definitely Photoshopped a medical degree.

Docter Sues Restaurant For Letting Him Eat a Whole Artichoke.

A Miami doctor is suing Hillstone Restaurant Group, parent of the Houston’s chain, after a bad experience with an artichoke. Apparently Arturo Carvajal ordered the off-menu special of “Grilled Artichokes.” Then he ate the entire thing, leaves and all.

According to the legal complaint via the Miami New Times, he suffered “severe abdominal pain and discomfort,” was admitted to the hospital and an “exploratory laparotomy was performed where artichoke leaves were found lodged within [his] small bowell [sic].”

More.

2. They could have just turned on the stereo.

Couple end up in court for making too much noise during sex.

A couple in Germany ended up in court, accused of breaking anti-noise pollution laws after neighours complained their bed had made too much noise while they were having sex.  More.

1.  When assault should be legal.

Court Bars Child Molester From Suing Victim’s Parents.

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has refused to follow a convicted child molester, Anna Knopf,  “down the rabbit hole” and allow her to sue the parents of the 13-year-old boy she assaulted for failing to protect him from her.

The lawsuit alleged sexual assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence. Knopf responded in extraordinary fashion — by filing a counterclaim against the child’s father and a third-party complaint against his mother in which she accused them of contributory negligence.

In one pleading, Knopf’s attorney, John P. Runde of Wausau, Wisc., reached the heights of chutzpah, suggesting the child’s parents helped

cause his injuries by trying to “find out for sure” who he was involved with rather than preventing him from having continued contacts with her.  More.

 

New Penalty For Mortgage Defaulters; Prisoners Cashed In on Tax Credit

New penalty for Mortgage Defaulters

In the past year, we’ve noticed a significant uptick in subject locate service requests by clients chasing mortgage defaulters.

Every type of dodge (for averting service) has been employed: from occupying the home only late at night for sleeping, to renting the house to someone other than the homeowner while attempting to individually selling the house to simply abandoning the property.

In an effort to discourage homeowners from walking away from their mortgage responsibilities, government-sponsored mortgage buyers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have announced a new, tougher policy that will ban defaulters from obtaining new loans for seven years.

The policy is aimed at the troubled borrowers who refuse to make good faith efforts to work out a deal to repay their loans.

The justification for the new Fannie and Freddie penalty is meant to discourage strategic defaulting, (when a homeowner simply stops making mortgage payments although s/he has the capability to do so).

Strategic defaulting default has become alarmingly popular in neighborhoods experiencing sharp house value declines.  In turn, this wave of unprecedented foreclosures has devalued entire communities.

Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac together, own or guarantee roughly half of all mortgages – 31 million loans valued at $5.5 trillion.

The federal government seized control of Fannie and Freddie in 2008, sending taxpayers a $145 billion bill, so far.   Neither of these two companies exhibits any signs of being self-sufficient in the foreseeable future.

When BNI becomes involved in locating mortgage defaulters, we advise our clients that these are not standard locates.  The people we are attempting to find are actively avoiding just that.  Whether the defaulter is in denial or trying to sell the property and recoup his/her investment, repay the loan and potentially even make money on the sale, the sheer number and complexity of these locates has certainly changed the scope of how we definitively identify and trace this particular group of subjects.

Our focus had broadened to include uncovering relatives, friends, co-workers, current and past business associates… It is extremely rare that a person will simply disappear, especially those with children.  Our experience has been that mortgage defaulters on the run will generally live with relatives or friends, and not unusually, will move out of state (mistakenly believing that crossing state lines will somehow absolve their debt).

How long will it take for commerical and private mortgage providers to install harsher default penalties?  Probably within several months, and undoubtedly sooner than government agencies Fannie or Freddie actually enact their new penalty policy.

Cease and Desist

In related news, after investigating hundreds of consumer complaints, NYS Attorney General Andrew Cuomo stated that as of Jun 24, 2010, his office has issued 180 cease and desist letters to national mortgage rescue companies that misrepresent themselves by implying an affiliation with the federal government. 

What Went Wrong Here??

1,300 tax filers grabbed $26.7 million in tax credits from the federal first time home owners incentive meant to boost the sagging housing market.

So why is this an attention-grabber?  These 1,300 individuals are all behind bars.  A common  scam by these prisoners had multiple (alleged) tax payers purchasing a single home, with each claiming the tax credit.  One home was simultaneously “purchased” 67 times. 

The IRS states it is taking steps to take this money back.  Good luck.

BNI Operatives: Street smart; web savvy.

As always, stay safe.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 190 other followers

%d bloggers like this: